HOW LEAF SPRINGS ARE MANUFACTURED

The production of a high-quality leaf spring is a specialized industrial process that transforms flat spring steel into a precision-engineered suspension component capable of withstanding millions of stress cycles. From raw material selection to final quality inspection, every step must be carefully controlled to ensure durability, dimensional accuracy, and fatigue resistance.

This comprehensive guide takes you through the complete manufacturing journey of leaf springs, covering both traditional steel production and modern composite alternatives. You'll discover the eleven critical production steps, from steel mill to finished product, understand the technical and economic challenges manufacturers face, and learn why certain dimensional parameters are absolutely critical for safe operation.

Whether used in trucks, trailers, vans, or off-road vehicles, leaf spring manufacturing demands precision at every stage. This chapter also explores emerging composite (GFRP) technologies and hybrid solutions that are reshaping the future of suspension systems, particularly in electric and lightweight vehicle applications.

Understanding how leaf springs are made provides valuable insight into what makes a quality suspension component, why proper manufacturing standards are critical for long-term reliability, and how the industry balances cost efficiency with uncompromising safety requirements.

Looking to purchase leaf springs? Select your vehicle type to find the right spring for your pickup, van, truck, or trailer.

Select vehicle

Leaf spring steels and how they are produced

The foundation of every high-performance leaf spring suspension system.

The performance, durability, and safety of a leaf spring depend first and foremost on its material. Whether for light commercial vehicles or 40-ton trucks, the right spring steel is essential to withstand millions of load cycles without cracking, sagging, or failing. Leaf spring manufacturing starts with carefully alloyed and processed spring steel, produced in specialized steel mills with strict quality controls.

What is leaf spring steel?

Leaf springs are typically made from high-strength alloyed spring steels, specially designed to offer:

High yield strength
Excellent fatigue resistance
Good toughness and ductility
Ability to undergo precise heat treatment
Stability under cyclic bending and torsion

The most common steel grades used in leaf springs include:

51CrV4 (EN 10089): chromium-vanadium steel with excellent fatigue life (main spring steel for parabolic springs)
55Cr3: a widely used chromium spring steel
60SiCr7 / 60SiMn5: silicon-manganese steel with good tempering response
SUP9 / SUP11A: common in Asian markets

The choice of steel depends on the application, expected loading conditions, desired lifespan, and cost targets.

Chemical composition of spring steels

Spring steels are carefully alloyed to balance strength and flexibility. A typical 51CrV4 composition includes:

Carbon (0.47-0.55%): increases hardness and strength
Chromium (0.9-1.2%): improves wear resistance and hardenability
Vanadium (0.10-0.25%): refines grain size and boosts fatigue resistance
Silicon (0.15-0.40%): adds toughness and elasticity

Low levels of sulfur and phosphorus are essential to avoid internal cracks and nonmetallic inclusions, which can severely reduce fatigue life.

Production of spring steel

Producing spring steel requires high-purity processing, controlled alloying, and precise thermomechanical treatment. Leading steel producers manufacture spring steel using the following process:

Electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking

High-quality scrap and raw materials are melted in an electric arc furnace. Additives are introduced to achieve the required chemical composition. This is followed by secondary metallurgy, such as ladle treatment and degassing, to remove impurities and ensure chemical uniformity.

Continuous casting

The molten steel is cast into billets or blooms, with careful control of cooling rates to minimize internal defects. Casting quality is critical to avoid inclusions or segregation that could weaken the final spring.

Hot rolling

The billets are reheated and rolled into flat bars or round bars, depending on the desired final profile. In leaf spring applications, the most common product is hot-rolled flat bar, often in dimensions like 50 × 8 mm, 70 × 10 mm, etc.

Controlled cooling and normalization

After rolling, the steel bars undergo controlled cooling to refine grain structure. In some cases, normalizing (heating to ~900°C and air cooling) is applied to homogenize the microstructure and prepare the steel for further processing.

Surface and dimensional control

Each batch is tested for dimensional tolerances, surface quality, hardness, and cleanliness. Surface defects such as decarburization, cracks, or scale must be avoided, as they can act as initiation points for fatigue cracks in the spring.

Importance of steel cleanliness and microstructure

The fatigue strength of a leaf spring is highly sensitive to internal defects. Modern spring steel producers aim to achieve:

Low non-metallic inclusion content
Fine, uniform grain structure
Low decarburization depth
Tight mechanical tolerances

Advanced testing methods such as ultrasonic inspection, microstructure analysis, and hardness profiling are used to verify material quality.

How hot-rolled spring steel flat bars are classified

In the manufacturing of steel leaf springs, the raw material is typically a hot-rolled flat bar made from high-grade spring steel. These flat bars come in a wide range of cross-sectional profiles, each designed to match specific requirements for spring performance, manufacturing method, and final geometry.

The most common rolled flat bar profile codes are:

"A" profile

Standard rectangular flat bar
Sharp corners and flat edges
Primarily used when further machining or reshaping is expected
Good for eye-rolling or parabolic tapering

"B" profile

Flat bar with slightly rounded corners
Reduces surface stress concentrations
Easier to handle and form during spring production
Commonly used in conventional multi-leaf springs

"C" profile

Rounded top edges, often with a slightly convex surface
Reduces interleaf friction and contact wear
Typically used when leaves slide over each other

"D" profile

Rounded top and bottom edges, sometimes semi-elliptical
Optimized for minimal interleaf contact and friction
Often selected for parabolic or Z-spring applications

"E" profile

Specialty profile, often asymmetric or partially tapered
Customized for specific OEM designs or unique forming processes

Each profile is available in a wide range of widths and thicknesses (e.g. 40 × 6 mm, 70 × 10 mm, 100 × 12 mm), and produced with tight dimensional tolerances to ensure consistency during spring forming and assembly.

Production process of leaf springs

How raw spring steel becomes a finished suspension component.

Step 1: Raw material preparation and cut to length

The process begins with hot-rolled spring steel flat bars, typically made from grades like 51CrV4, 55Cr3, or 60SiCr7. These bars are delivered in standard profile shapes (e.g. A, B, C profile) and are inspected for:

Surface defects (cracks, scale, decarburization)
Dimensional tolerances (width, thickness, edge shape)
Mechanical properties (hardness, cleanliness, microstructure)

Bars are then cut to length, according to the target spring design.

Step 2: Center hole punching

Before any forming or shaping begins, the center hole is punched into the spring leaf. This hole becomes the primary reference point for many subsequent operations, especially when the spring is asymmetrical in length or geometry.

The center hole serves a structural function: it allows the entire spring pack (consisting of multiple leaves) to be securely clamped together using a center bolt.

The precise location of the center hole ensures correct alignment throughout the process chain and helps maintain consistent spring geometry.

Depending on the material thickness and application, the hole can be produced in three different ways:

Hot punching: for thicker sections, using localized heating and high-force pressing
Cold punching: for thinner materials, typically under 10 mm, done on mechanical or hydraulic presses
Drilling: used in special applications, where high accuracy is required

It is crucial that the center hole has no sharp edges, burrs, or microcracks. On the tension side of the spring (usually the top surface), the hole should include a smooth radius or slight chamfer to reduce the risk of fatigue crack initiation.

Step 3: Tapering (depending on spring type)

At this stage, the processing path diverges depending on whether the leaf is part of a conventional multi-leaf spring or a parabolic spring.

For parabolic spring leaves

Parabolic spring leaves require an additional shaping process to create their variable thickness profile, which reduces weight and interleaf friction while maintaining strength.

The spring leaf is partially heated, typically one half at a time, to a temperature between 900-950°C
Once at the correct temperature, the tapering is done by rolling, using CNC-controlled parabolic rolling machines
The rollers gradually reduce the thickness from the center toward the ends, following a precise parabolic curve
Tapering is symmetrical unless a special, asymmetrical load response is required

After tapering, the leaf is often allowed to cool down naturally before moving to the next operation.

For conventional spring leaves

In conventional multi-leaf spring production, the full-length profile of each leaf remains uniform, but a localized taper is often applied at the ends to support better stress distribution and reduce interleaf wear.

The spring leaf is uniformly heated to around 850-950°C, depending on material
Heating is performed in a gas-fired or induction furnace
A localized tapering process, known as end rolling, is applied to the last 50-100 mm of each leaf
The ends are thinned using heated rollers or press-forming dies

This end taper reduces stress concentration at the tips and allows the spring pack to flex more smoothly, especially under partial load.

End forming operations

Once the spring leaf has been heated and (if applicable) tapered, the next stage is to form and shape the ends of the spring, depending on its function within the suspension system.

Typical end-forming operations include:

Eye rolling

The most common operation for main leaves, where the heated end is rolled into a circular eye. This eye is used for mounting the spring to the chassis with bushings and bolts. The process is done using a hydraulic or mechanical rolling press with mandrels of precise diameters.

Eye rolling must ensure:

Correct diameter and alignment
Smooth radius to avoid fatigue cracks
Controlled inner surface for bushing fit

End wrapping

Applied mainly to wrap leaves, which serve as safety reinforcements to the main leaf eye. The wrap leaf is heated and partially coiled around the main leaf eye without forming its own eye. This ensures axle stability in case of main leaf failure.

End cutting

The spring end is trimmed or shaped according to the spring's design. Common end shapes include:

Beveled or chamfered ends
Round or fishtail cuts
Hooked or curled forms

Proper end geometry helps control stress flow and improves spring pack nesting.

Accessory hole punching or drilling

In some designs, holes are punched or drilled near the spring ends to attach rubber pads, clamps, anti-friction liners, or noise dampers. These operations must:

Maintain hole quality (no burrs or cracks)
Avoid excessive weakening of the spring section
Preserve symmetry and alignment

These end-forming operations are performed while the material is still hot, usually in the 750-850°C range, to allow precise forming without cracking.

Step 5: Heat treatment including camber forming

This stage transforms the soft spring blank into a hardened, flexible, and durable leaf spring through a combination of controlled heating, precise camber forming, and heat treatment.

Phase 1: Input material condition

At the beginning of this stage, the spring leaf is still in its soft, untempered condition, sometimes referred to as annealed spring steel. Its metallurgical structure is typically ferrite-pearlite, and the Brinell hardness (HB) is around 180-220 HB.

Phase 2: Heating to austenitizing temperature

The spring leaf is heated to 900-950°C in a gas-fired furnace or via induction heating. The key requirements for this step are:

The entire cross-section must reach the target temperature
The internal structure must fully transform into homogeneous austenite
Soaking time is adjusted depending on material thickness and furnace type

Uniform heating ensures consistent mechanical properties across the spring and prevents quenching cracks in the next step.

Phase 3: Camber forming (bending)

Once the spring leaf is fully austenitized, it is transferred from the furnace to a hydraulic cambering frame or press. While still hot and malleable:

The spring is bent to the required curvature (camber), as per its role in the suspension system
The center hole previously punched is used as a reference to ensure correct symmetry and alignment
This shaping must be precise, as it determines ride height and load-bearing geometry

The bending operation must be completed swiftly, as the steel begins to cool rapidly once exposed to ambient air.

Phase 4: Quenching (hardening)

Immediately after bending, the spring must be rapidly cooled to transform the austenite structure into martensite, a hard but brittle phase that provides high strength. There are two industrial approaches:

In-frame quenching: the entire cambering frame, with the spring leaf in position, is submerged into a 50°C oil bath
Free quenching: after bending, the spring leaf is removed from the press, and a robotic arm or operator places it into the oil

The timing of quenching is critical. The steel must be cooled fast enough to follow its Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT) diagram, avoiding the formation of bainite or pearlite. Proper quenching results in a mostly martensitic microstructure, which is very hard but also brittle.

Phase 5: Tempering (stress relief and toughness)

To restore ductility and toughness, the quenched spring leaf undergoes tempering. The process involves:

Reheating the spring to 400-450°C
Holding it for a set period (depending on material and section thickness)
Cooling down very slowly inside the furnace or in controlled air to prevent residual stresses

Tempering relieves internal stress and gives the spring its final elastic and fatigue-resistant behavior.

Phase 6: Final cooling and hardness range

After tempering, the spring leaf exits the furnace. To stabilize its temperature and clean off oil residues, it is typically showered with ~30°C water. This gentle rinse brings the steel to ambient temperature in a controlled way.

At this stage, the spring reaches its final mechanical properties, including:

Hardness: 350-500 HB, depending on steel grade and application
Excellent flexibility and fatigue resistance
A stable, tempered martensitic structure

Step 6: Final machining and dimensional adjustment (optional)

This step is optional and depends on the design, tolerance requirements, and mounting configuration of the specific spring application. Now that the spring leaf has reached its final shape and metallurgical properties, any fine-tuning operations can be safely performed to achieve precise fitting and assembly standards.

These post-treatment machining steps typically include:

Eye reaming

After heat treatment and tempering, the spring eye may slightly distort. A reaming process is applied to:

Ensure a precise inner diameter
Guarantee proper fitment of spring eye bushings
Maintain alignment and concentricity to avoid uneven wear

Side milling

The sides of the spring may need to be milled:

Around the center hole area, where U-bolts and center clamps are mounted
At the ends of the spring leaf, if they interface with guide brackets or shackle plates

This ensures that width tolerances and parallelism are within required limits.

Drilling or refining additional accessory holes

If necessary, this is the point at which bolt holes, bracket slots, or damping pad seats are finalized with precision.

These adjustments must be made without inducing heat or excessive vibration, as the spring is now in its hardened state and may develop surface cracks if mishandled.

Step 7: Shot peening / stress peening

Shot peening is a key post-treatment process used to increase the fatigue strength and durability of leaf springs. It is especially critical in preventing premature failure due to cyclic loading and surface stress concentrations.

Purpose of shot peening

During heat treatment and cambering, residual tensile stresses can develop on the surface of the spring. These stresses are harmful over time, as they can initiate fatigue cracks. Shot peening replaces these with compressive stresses, which drastically improve the leaf's fatigue resistance.

How it works

Tiny steel or ceramic balls ("shots") are blasted at high speed against the surface of the spring
Each impact creates a microscopic indentation, plastically deforming the surface
This introduces a layer of residual compressive stress, typically 0.1-0.3 mm deep
The compressive stress opposes operating stress, delaying or eliminating fatigue crack formation

Differences between conventional and parabolic springs

Conventional springs - classical shot peening

Applied only on the tension side (usually the top surface)
The spring leaf remains unstressed during peening
Typical for multi-leaf springs, where only the uppermost leaves carry significant tensile stress on their surface
Improves life expectancy by 30-70%, depending on loading conditions

Parabolic springs - stress peening

A more advanced version of shot peening, specially developed for parabolic springs
The spring leaf is first preloaded into a bent shape (opposite to the camber), using a hydraulic press or mechanical jig
Then, while in this preloaded condition, it is placed into a special cassette that maintains the deformation
The cassette and spring go together into the peening chamber
The cassette design allows peening material to reach both sides
This method introduces deeper and more effective compressive stresses across the full surface

Stress peening is essential for parabolic springs to ensure long-term reliability under high dynamic loads and is often required by OEM standards for truck and bus applications.

Step 8: Coating and painting

Once the spring leaves have undergone all critical mechanical and surface treatment processes, the final production step is coating or painting. This process provides corrosion protection, improves durability, and enhances the appearance of the spring product.

Primary purposes of coating

To protect the spring steel from environmental corrosion (moisture, salt, chemicals)
To ensure a clean appearance for OEM or aftermarket requirements
To reduce friction between stacked leaves in multi-leaf assemblies (if friction-reducing treatments are included)
To support brand identification via color or marking

Common coating methods

Dip painting

The most traditional and cost-effective method
Spring leaves are dipped in a black industrial-grade paint
Provides basic rust protection and uniform coverage
Commonly used for conventional leaf springs

Electrostatic powder coating

Used in higher-end or OEM applications
Dry paint powder is electrostatically applied and cured in an oven
Provides a durable, thick, and chip-resistant coating
Available in various colors (black, gray, red, etc.)
Often used for parabolic springs or aesthetic applications

Cataphoretic coating (KTL coating)

High-quality electrophoretic dip coating, similar to automotive chassis treatment
Offers excellent corrosion resistance, even in salt spray environments
More expensive but preferred by leading manufacturers for premium or export markets

Zinc-phosphate or manganese-phosphate coating

Used as pre-treatment for painting or powder coating
Improves adhesion and corrosion performance
Optional depending on specification

Key technical considerations

Surfaces must be clean and dry before coating
Thickness of coating must remain within defined tolerances to avoid interference during assembly
No paint should enter critical surfaces, such as eye inner bores, center holes, or friction zones

Step 9: Assembly of the complete spring pack

After all individual spring leaves have been produced, treated, and coated, the final product is assembled into a complete spring pack (also known as a leaf spring bundle). This process is mechanical, but must be performed with high precision to ensure alignment, preload distribution, and safety.

Assembly process steps

Leaf sorting and orientation

The spring leaves are arranged in order, from main leaf to shortest leaf, based on their design
Special attention is paid to camber matching, symmetry, orientation of tapered ends and holes
Insert leaf spring bush to main spring leaf eye

Clamping of the leaves

The stacked leaves are placed into a jig or clamping station
Hydraulic or mechanical clamps compress the leaves together to apply initial preload
Preload is necessary to ensure tight leaf contact and prevent movement and noise during vehicle operation

Inserting the center bolt

A center bolt (or spring bolt) is inserted through the pre-punched center holes
It is tightened to a specific torque, pulling the stack together
The head of the center bolt often acts as a positioning pin for axle mounting
Excess bolt thread is cut off or sheared to ensure clearance

Installing side clamps or rebound clips

Depending on the design, the spring pack is equipped with U-shaped clamps, rebound clips, or friction-reducing linings
These help maintain alignment during dynamic compression and extension
The clamp position is critical to avoid stress concentration

Rubber or plastic pads installation (if required)

Often inserted between leaves in low-friction or noise-sensitive designs
Especially used in trailer springs or passenger applications

Step 10: Leaf spring setting and load-deflection verification

The final step in the leaf spring assembly process is known as spring setting (also called "blocking" or "presetting"). This step ensures that the spring achieves its final camber shape and stabilizes its load-deflection behavior before it reaches the customer or vehicle assembly line.

What is spring setting?

Spring setting involves applying a defined static load to the fully assembled spring. This process compresses the spring to a target load, typically close to or slightly beyond its working range, in order to:

Relieve internal stress concentrations
Ensure stable camber geometry
Prevent initial sagging in vehicle operation
Simulate the "settling" that would otherwise occur during early vehicle use

Process steps

Placing the spring in a test press

The assembled spring is positioned in a calibrated spring testing frame
Fixture ensures proper alignment and contact on both eyes or fixing points

Loading the spring to a defined value

A force equal to the spring's rated static load (or higher) is applied using a hydraulic actuator
Typical load levels: 100-120% of design load for conventional springs, 80-100% for parabolic springs

Monitoring the final camber

After the setting load is removed, the spring is inspected to ensure it returns to its target free arch (camber) within tolerances
This confirms the spring's plastic deformation and internal stress stabilization are complete

Load-deflection measurement and documentation

After setting, the spring undergoes a controlled load-deflection test to measure its stiffness (spring rate) and elastic performance.

The spring is loaded in increments (e.g., every 100-200 kg)
Deflection is recorded at each point (in mm)
The resulting curve is stored digitally or printed for quality documentation
Each spring or batch receives a test certificate or QR traceability label linking it to this data

Step 11: Quality inspection with focus on metallurgical verification

Throughout the leaf spring production process, quality assurance is applied at multiple stages. However, one of the most critical and technically sophisticated inspections is the random metallurgical inspection of the spring steel itself.

This step ensures that the mechanical properties, heat treatment results, and microstructure of the steel are consistent with the specified standards.

When is metallurgical inspection performed?

Typically on a batch basis (e.g. every X tons or every X springs)
After heat treatment and before or after shot peening
Usually applied to main leaves, but also to random samples from shorter leaves or helper springs

How is metallurgical inspection performed?

Sample cutting

A small piece is cut from a spring leaf (commonly at the end or a test coupon)
Care is taken to avoid affecting the working section of the spring
Samples are marked and logged for traceability

Hardness testing

Brinell (HBW) or Rockwell (HRC) hardness tests are conducted
Surface and sometimes core hardness are checked to ensure proper quenching and tempering
Typical hardness range: 350-500 HB depending on the application

Microstructure analysis

Samples are polished and etched to reveal the steel's internal structure under microscope
Goal: verify a uniform tempered martensite structure with minimal ferrite or bainite
Any decarburization, grain boundary issues, or inclusions near the surface are noted

Inclusion rating (optional, advanced)

Non-metallic inclusions are detected via optical microscopy or scanning electron microscope (SEM)
Critical for fatigue-prone applications such as parabolic springs
Inclusion types and sizes are rated using DIN 50602, ASTM E45, or ISO 4967 standards

Surface inspection

Crack detection using magnetic particle inspection (MPI) or dye penetrant testing
Especially important after heat treatment and before coating
Ensures that no microcracks exist at the surface where stress peaks may occur

Decarburization verification

A key aspect of metallurgical inspection is to check for surface decarburization, the loss of carbon near the surface of the spring leaf. This typically occurs during:

Open-flame heating (e.g., during manual repairs or incorrect forming)
Improper furnace control
Too long soaking time at high temperatures during heat treatment

Since carbon content is essential for hardness and fatigue strength, decarburized zones can severely weaken the spring, especially on the tension-loaded surface.

How it's tested:

Hardness profile testing

Hardness is measured at multiple depths using a microhardness tester
Typically: 0.1 mm from surface (tension side), 0.5 mm from surface, core (center of material thickness)
All measurements are compared to check for consistency

Acceptance criteria

The difference between surface and core hardness must remain within specified tolerance
For example: surface hardness ≥ 90% of core hardness
Or: decarburization depth must be < 0.2 mm for most spring steels
Specifications often follow ISO 3887, DIN EN 10328, or ASTM E1077

Microstructure check (optional or if hardness results are questionable)

Metallographic cross-sections are polished and etched
A visibly ferritic or soft zone near the surface indicates decarburization
Depth is measured under microscope and compared to spec

Challenges of efficient leaf spring production

Producing high-quality leaf springs is a complex industrial process that combines metallurgical precision, mechanical forming, surface treatments, and tight dimensional tolerances. To remain competitive, manufacturers must balance product quality, cost efficiency, and production flexibility, all under increasing pressure from raw material costs, energy prices, and market demand variability.

Below we explore the key challenges faced by leaf spring manufacturers today.

Balancing batch size vs. changeover times

Many critical stages of leaf spring manufacturing, especially heat treatment, parabolic rolling, and eye rolling, require long changeover times when switching from one product type to another.

Challenge:

Small batches increase flexibility but raise per-unit costs due to more frequent changeovers
Large batches reduce setup time per unit but increase stock and slow reaction time

Manufacturers must carefully plan production schedules to minimize changeover frequency while maintaining reasonable inventory levels and delivery times.

Automation vs. production flexibility

Introducing automation and robotics into leaf spring production, especially for steps like:

Eye rolling
Parabolic tapering
Handling in heat treatment and quenching
Assembly operations

...can significantly reduce labor cost, improve repeatability, and enhance worker safety.

Challenge:

Automation systems are typically less flexible
Switching to a different product geometry may require physical retooling, programming updates, or even separate robotic stations
High initial investment for automated equipment
Balancing the cost of automation against production volume requirements

Steel cost and financing burden

Spring-grade steel represents 40-60% of the total cost of a finished spring, depending on spring type and leaf count. This includes costs for:

High-quality rolled profiles
Transport and storage
Scrap and offcuts during trimming, eye forming, or parabolic tapering

Challenge:

High steel cost ties up significant working capital
Long lead times from mills can cause stockpiling, increasing financing and warehouse costs
Price volatility in raw materials affects profitability
Need for strong relationships with steel suppliers to ensure quality and delivery

Energy efficiency: gas vs. induction heating

Heat treatment is one of the most energy-intensive steps in spring production. The debate between using:

Gas furnaces (for high-volume, continuous heating)
Induction furnaces (for fast, precise, and localized heating)

...is increasingly important as energy prices rise globally.

Challenge:

Gas furnaces have high inertia and long heating times but are more suitable for bulk processing
Induction is more efficient and faster, but less effective for thick sections or large batches
Both systems have different maintenance, emission, and floor space requirements
Rising energy costs force manufacturers to optimize furnace utilization and consider alternative technologies

Maintaining quality under cost pressure

Customers (especially OEMs) demand:

High fatigue life
Traceability
Exact load-deflection compliance
Corrosion protection (e.g., KTL coating or powder coating)

Challenge:

Achieving these at low production cost is difficult
Skipping or simplifying processes (like stress peening, surface finishing, microstructure inspection) reduces cost but compromises durability
Quality control requires expensive equipment and skilled personnel
Balancing customer requirements with competitive pricing

Investment cost and entry barriers for starting a leaf spring factory

While leaf springs may appear to be a simple suspension component, their production requires a dedicated, capital-intensive manufacturing setup. Unlike general metalworking or stamping industries, most machines used in leaf spring production are highly specialized and often cannot be repurposed for other applications.

This creates a high entry barrier for new players in the market, both in terms of initial investment and the ramp-up learning curve.

High investment requirements

Setting up an efficient leaf spring production facility with an annual capacity of approximately 5,000 tons (mid-size factory) requires a substantial capital investment, even before land and building costs.

Estimated capital expenditure (CAPEX):

Heat treatment line (furnace, oil quench system, bending frame, automation): 1-2 million EUR
Parabolic rolling mill with integrated furnace: 0.5-1 million EUR
Stress peening system with handling cassette setup: ~1 million EUR
Eye rolling machines, end forming tools, punching stations: 0.5-0.8 million EUR
Shot peening machine (for conventional springs): 0.3-0.6 million EUR
Assembly equipment (clamps, presses, bolt installation, measurement): 0.2-0.4 million EUR
Coating line (e.g., electrostatic, KTL, or spray booth): 0.4-0.6 million EUR
Quality control systems (hardness tester, microscope, test rig): 0.1-0.2 million EUR
Material handling (robots, overhead cranes, conveyors): 0.3-0.5 million EUR

Total estimated investment (excluding building, infrastructure, stock): 10-15 million EUR for a lean but modern facility

Highly specialized equipment

Most of the key machinery used in leaf spring manufacturing, such as bending frames, tapering rolls, camber-setting presses, and peening stations, are custom-built or OEM-specific. These are not modular systems that can be easily adapted for other industries, meaning:

Low equipment resale value if production stops
Long lead times for spare parts and maintenance
Few global suppliers, leading to dependency

Long ramp-up curve and hidden costs

Even after installation, reaching stable serial production takes several months due to:

Process calibration (especially heat treatment and load-deflection compliance)
Staff training (operators, QC technicians, maintenance)
Product qualification cycles with OEMs
Waste and scrap rates in early batches

This "learning curve" results in:

High initial unit costs
Delayed revenue inflow
Need for buffer capital to support cash flow

Operational challenges beyond setup

Once operational, maintaining efficiency is an ongoing challenge due to:

Batch-size optimization
High steel price volatility
Balancing automation and flexibility
Rising energy costs for thermal processes

Conclusion

Starting a leaf spring factory is not a low-risk venture. It requires:

Significant upfront investment in highly specialized machinery
Technical know-how in metallurgy, fatigue performance, and dimensional control
Long ramp-up period before stable production and customer approval

For these reasons, the global market is dominated by a few experienced manufacturers with long-term OEM relationships and vertically integrated operations.

However, for those who succeed, leaf spring manufacturing offers a strategic niche with stable demand, especially in regions with growing commercial vehicle and trailer markets.

Critical parameters in leaf spring production

In order to function safely and efficiently over thousands of load cycles, a leaf spring must meet strict dimensional and mechanical specifications. Even minor deviations in key parameters can lead to problems such as premature wear, bushing damage, loss of axle alignment, or even spring failure.

Below are the most critical parameters that must be tightly controlled during the production of both conventional and parabolic leaf springs.

Half-length (distance between center hole and spring eye)

Defines the asymmetry of the spring
Affects axle positioning, load distribution, and ride height
Especially important in asymmetrical springs (long and short arms)

Controlled during:

Punching of center hole
Eye forming
Camber forming

Tolerance range: typically ±1 mm

Diameter of spring eye

Critical for press-fitting the bushing
Affects noise, movement resistance, and wear life
Too loose = rattle, too tight = bushing deformation or cracking

Controlled during:

Eye rolling and final eye reaming/machining

Typical tolerance: ±0.1 mm, depending on bushing design

Parallelism of spring eye axes

Both spring eyes must be aligned on the same plane
Misalignment causes twisting of shackles, increased friction, and uneven load transfer

Controlled during:

Eye forming
Final inspection with parallelism jigs or 3D measuring arms

Tolerance: often below 0.3° angular deviation

Flatness in the center hole area

Ensures tight contact with axle seat and prevents bending stress peaks
Poor flatness may cause loosening of U-bolts, leading to misalignment or fracture

Controlled during:

Post-quenching straightening
Final milling or surface grinding of contact zones

Flatness tolerance: typically <0.2 mm deviation across full contact area

Arching (camber)

Defines the initial load capacity and spring rate
Inconsistent camber results in left-right vehicle lean, incorrect ride height, and uneven suspension response

Controlled during:

Camber forming (Step 5)
Verified by load-deflection test (Step 10)

Tolerance: ±2 mm at the center, depending on spring type

Hardness

Ensures the spring can store and release energy repeatedly without permanent deformation
Affects fatigue life, elasticity, and wear resistance

Controlled during:

Heat treatment (quenching + tempering)
Verified via Brinell or Rockwell testing (Step 11)

Target hardness: 350-500 HB depending on design

Width of functional zones

Includes U-bolt zone, spring eye arms, end tapers
Impacts fitment accuracy, contact with clamps, shackles, spacers, friction and stress concentrations

Controlled during:

Tapering, eye forming, milling (Steps 3-6)

Tolerance: typically ±0.5 mm for key areas

Parabolic profile (for parabolic springs only)

The thickness taper must follow a true parabolic curve
Affects spring flexibility, stress distribution, load-deflection response, and interleaf clearance

Controlled during:

Parabolic rolling or milling (Step 3 - parabolic version)
Verified via thickness measurement along the spring length

Deviation from nominal profile: max ±0.2 mm across full leaf length

Conclusion

Leaf springs may appear robust, but their functionality depends on precision manufacturing. These critical parameters must be continuously monitored, not only during final inspection but throughout each production stage.

Investing in accurate tooling, CNC-controlled processes, and dimensional inspection equipment is essential to ensure every spring meets the high expectations of OEM durability, safety, and ride performance.

Composite (GFRP) leaf springs

As lightweight vehicle design becomes increasingly important, especially for electric vehicles and modern commercial vehicles, composite leaf springs, typically made from glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP), offer an alternative to traditional steel suspension systems.

This section explores the principles behind composite leaf springs, their production process and material, hybrid spring configurations, aftermarket acceptance, and a detailed comparison with steel springs.

What is a composite leaf spring?

Composite leaf springs are made from:

Continuous glass fibers (usually E-glass)
Embedded in a thermosetting resin matrix (e.g. epoxy or polyurethane)

These materials combine to deliver directional strength, lightweight, and resilience, making them suitable for modern suspension systems.

Why do composite leaf springs make sense?

The use of GFRP leaf springs in suspension offers several technical benefits:

Key advantages:

Up to 70% weight savings over steel
Corrosion resistance (no rust, ideal for wet or salted environments)
Noise reduction due to absence of interleaf friction
Tailored flexibility and progressive spring rates
Long fatigue life under normal use
Non-conductive and non-magnetic, suitable for EV platforms

However, these advantages come with trade-offs in cost, manufacturing complexity, and perception. An example: a single leaf spring for Mercedes Sprinter can have half or third the cost if made from steel in comparison to composite materials.

Hybrid spring configurations

In some commercial vehicle applications, hybrid leaf springs are used:

Main leaf (which bears eyelets and U-bolt area) remains steel
Secondary leaves (2nd, 3rd, etc.) are made from composite GFK

This solution combines:

Structural reliability and conventional mounting of steel
With the weight savings and damping properties of composites
While reducing stress between layers and improving comfort

Hybrid systems are increasingly being tested and used in light-duty trucks, buses, and EVs.

Production process of composite leaf springs

Composite springs are manufactured through resin-matrix processes:

Fiber placement

Continuous fibers are laid in molds following the spring's load path
Fiber orientation is optimized for deflection and strength

Resin infusion and molding

Fibers are impregnated with resin via RTM, wet lay-up, or compression molding
Precise dosing and vacuum techniques ensure void-free structure

Curing

Spring is heated in mold (130-180°C) for controlled curing
After curing, the part retains its final shape

Trimming and machining

Spring ends and interface areas are drilled or milled as required
Surface treatment may be applied for abrasion and UV protection

Aftermarket perception and limitations

While composite springs are well accepted by OEMs, aftermarket customers remain skeptical. Common concerns include:

They are often called "plastic springs"
Considered too weak or unreliable
Replacement parts are not widely available
Mechanics may lack training for composite part handling

Steel replacements for composite

It is possible to replace a composite leaf spring with a steel equivalent, but:

Suspension geometry must be re-evaluated (ride height, stiffness, clearance)
Fitting hardware, such as U-bolts, brackets, and dampers, may need to be replaced
Load-deflection characteristics will differ, affecting vehicle behavior

Therefore, such conversions should be handled case by case, with technical support.

Future and application range

Composite leaf springs are best suited for:

Electric vehicles (weight and corrosion critical)
Passenger cars and SUVs (comfort and noise optimization)
Light commercial vehicles (payload + efficiency balance)
Hybrid spring systems in medium trucks

However, for heavy-duty applications, steel remains dominant due to:

Robustness under torsion and overload
Simplicity of integration
Wide service network compatibility

Conclusion

Composite GFK leaf springs represent a high-tech alternative to traditional steel springs, offering significant weight and comfort advantages. However, they require:

Specialized design and simulation tools
Dedicated production lines
Customer education, especially in the aftermarket
Price level is currently double or triple

While composite springs will not replace steel in every application, they are gaining market share in the mobility segments that prioritize weight savings, durability, and modern vehicle architectures.